Odama Santana Gil vs Laura Martin Perez
2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Odama Santana Gil vs Laura Martin Perez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Odama Santana Gil (1598)
- Black
- Laura Martin Perez (1946)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Odama Santana Gil (1598) and Laura Martin Perez (1946) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (B34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Odama Santana Gil games or Laura Martin Perez games? This Odama Santana Gil vs Laura Martin Perez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Odama Santana Gil vs Laura Martin Perez?
Odama Santana Gil vs Laura Martin Perez (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Odama Santana Gil vs Laura Martin Perez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation (ECO B34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Odama Santana Gil vs Laura Martin Perez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.