Michel Sanner vs Guy Mazzoni
1964 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (A23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michel Sanner vs Guy Mazzoni with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michel Sanner (2159)
- Black
- Guy Mazzoni
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 1964
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (A23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michel Sanner (2159) and Guy Mazzoni was played in 1964 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (A23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michel Sanner games or Guy Mazzoni games? This Michel Sanner vs Guy Mazzoni encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michel Sanner vs Guy Mazzoni?
Michel Sanner vs Guy Mazzoni (1964) finished 0–1, a win for Guy Mazzoni.
What opening was played in Michel Sanner vs Guy Mazzoni?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Keres Variation (ECO A23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michel Sanner vs Guy Mazzoni, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.