Gianlazzaro Sanna vs Renzo Mantovani
Arcidosso ch-ITA, 1985 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gianlazzaro Sanna vs Renzo Mantovani with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gianlazzaro Sanna (2335)
- Black
- Renzo Mantovani (2365)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Arcidosso ch-ITA
- Year
- 1985
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gianlazzaro Sanna (2335) and Renzo Mantovani (2365) was played at Arcidosso ch-ITA in 1985 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gianlazzaro Sanna games or Renzo Mantovani games? This Gianlazzaro Sanna vs Renzo Mantovani encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gianlazzaro Sanna vs Renzo Mantovani?
Gianlazzaro Sanna vs Renzo Mantovani (1985) finished 1–0, a win for Gianlazzaro Sanna.
What opening was played in Gianlazzaro Sanna vs Renzo Mantovani?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gianlazzaro Sanna vs Renzo Mantovani, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.