Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni vs Gianluca Jorio Almeida
2017 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni vs Gianluca Jorio Almeida with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni (1769)
- Black
- Gianluca Jorio Almeida (2039)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni (1769) and Gianluca Jorio Almeida (2039) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni games or Gianluca Jorio Almeida games? This Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni vs Gianluca Jorio Almeida encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni vs Gianluca Jorio Almeida?
Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni vs Gianluca Jorio Almeida (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Gianluca Jorio Almeida.
What opening was played in Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni vs Gianluca Jorio Almeida?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcello Gouveia Sangiovanni vs Gianluca Jorio Almeida, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.