Abril Sanchez vs Rodolfo Perez Wertheim
2018 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Abril Sanchez vs Rodolfo Perez Wertheim with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Abril Sanchez (1612)
- Black
- Rodolfo Perez Wertheim (1926)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Abril Sanchez (1612) and Rodolfo Perez Wertheim (1926) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Abril Sanchez games or Rodolfo Perez Wertheim games? This Abril Sanchez vs Rodolfo Perez Wertheim encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Abril Sanchez vs Rodolfo Perez Wertheim?
Abril Sanchez vs Rodolfo Perez Wertheim (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Rodolfo Perez Wertheim.
What opening was played in Abril Sanchez vs Rodolfo Perez Wertheim?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Abril Sanchez vs Rodolfo Perez Wertheim, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.