Jose Luis Sanchez Segura vs Miguel Litovicius
date unknown · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Luis Sanchez Segura vs Miguel Litovicius with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Miguel Litovicius (2345)
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Luis Sanchez Segura and Miguel Litovicius (2345) was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Luis Sanchez Segura games or Miguel Litovicius games? This Jose Luis Sanchez Segura vs Miguel Litovicius encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Luis Sanchez Segura vs Miguel Litovicius?
Jose Luis Sanchez Segura vs Miguel Litovicius finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jose Luis Sanchez Segura vs Miguel Litovicius?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (ECO B82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Luis Sanchez Segura vs Miguel Litovicius, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.