Vicente Sanchez Raboso vs Javier Castellote Lillo
2007 · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (A67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vicente Sanchez Raboso vs Javier Castellote Lillo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vicente Sanchez Raboso (2122)
- Black
- Javier Castellote Lillo (1927)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (A67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vicente Sanchez Raboso (2122) and Javier Castellote Lillo (1927) was played in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (A67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vicente Sanchez Raboso games or Javier Castellote Lillo games? This Vicente Sanchez Raboso vs Javier Castellote Lillo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vicente Sanchez Raboso vs Javier Castellote Lillo?
Vicente Sanchez Raboso vs Javier Castellote Lillo (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Vicente Sanchez Raboso.
What opening was played in Vicente Sanchez Raboso vs Javier Castellote Lillo?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (ECO A67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vicente Sanchez Raboso vs Javier Castellote Lillo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.