Antonio Sanchez Guisado vs Jordi Bertran Cequiel
2014 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Sanchez Guisado vs Jordi Bertran Cequiel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Sanchez Guisado (1837)
- Black
- Jordi Bertran Cequiel (1747)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Sanchez Guisado (1837) and Jordi Bertran Cequiel (1747) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Sanchez Guisado games or Jordi Bertran Cequiel games? This Antonio Sanchez Guisado vs Jordi Bertran Cequiel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Sanchez Guisado vs Jordi Bertran Cequiel?
Antonio Sanchez Guisado vs Jordi Bertran Cequiel (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Antonio Sanchez Guisado vs Jordi Bertran Cequiel?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Sanchez Guisado vs Jordi Bertran Cequiel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.