Aurelio Sanchez Garcia vs Federico Lopez Orellana
2019 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aurelio Sanchez Garcia vs Federico Lopez Orellana with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aurelio Sanchez Garcia (2011)
- Black
- Federico Lopez Orellana (1752)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aurelio Sanchez Garcia (2011) and Federico Lopez Orellana (1752) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aurelio Sanchez Garcia games or Federico Lopez Orellana games? This Aurelio Sanchez Garcia vs Federico Lopez Orellana encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aurelio Sanchez Garcia vs Federico Lopez Orellana?
Aurelio Sanchez Garcia vs Federico Lopez Orellana (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Aurelio Sanchez Garcia.
What opening was played in Aurelio Sanchez Garcia vs Federico Lopez Orellana?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (ECO A87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aurelio Sanchez Garcia vs Federico Lopez Orellana, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.