Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa vs David Duque Vasquez
1421, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Classical Variation (C53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa vs David Duque Vasquez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa (1342)
- Black
- David Duque Vasquez (1678)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 1421
- Opening
- Italian Game: Classical Variation (C53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa (1342) and David Duque Vasquez (1678) was played at 1421 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Classical Variation (C53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa games or David Duque Vasquez games? This Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa vs David Duque Vasquez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa vs David Duque Vasquez?
Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa vs David Duque Vasquez finished 0–1, a win for David Duque Vasquez.
What opening was played in Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa vs David Duque Vasquez?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Classical Variation (ECO C53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Camilo Sanchez Correa vs David Duque Vasquez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.