Pablo Sampedro Barrios vs Juan Andres Cerezo
date unknown · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pablo Sampedro Barrios vs Juan Andres Cerezo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pablo Sampedro Barrios (2056)
- Black
- Juan Andres Cerezo (1930)
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pablo Sampedro Barrios (2056) and Juan Andres Cerezo (1930) was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pablo Sampedro Barrios games or Juan Andres Cerezo games? This Pablo Sampedro Barrios vs Juan Andres Cerezo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pablo Sampedro Barrios vs Juan Andres Cerezo?
Pablo Sampedro Barrios vs Juan Andres Cerezo finished 0–1, a win for Juan Andres Cerezo.
What opening was played in Pablo Sampedro Barrios vs Juan Andres Cerezo?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pablo Sampedro Barrios vs Juan Andres Cerezo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.