Diana Samigullina vs Alexandra Batrak
2009 · Result 1–0 · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Diana Samigullina vs Alexandra Batrak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Diana Samigullina (2116)
- Black
- Alexandra Batrak (1941)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Diana Samigullina (2116) and Alexandra Batrak (1941) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Diana Samigullina games or Alexandra Batrak games? This Diana Samigullina vs Alexandra Batrak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Diana Samigullina vs Alexandra Batrak?
Diana Samigullina vs Alexandra Batrak (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Diana Samigullina.
What opening was played in Diana Samigullina vs Alexandra Batrak?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Diana Samigullina vs Alexandra Batrak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.