Samdan Samdanov vs Evgeniy Baglaev
Ch Buryatia, 2012 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samdan Samdanov vs Evgeniy Baglaev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samdan Samdanov (2231)
- Black
- Evgeniy Baglaev (2090)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Ch Buryatia
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samdan Samdanov (2231) and Evgeniy Baglaev (2090) was played at Ch Buryatia in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samdan Samdanov games or Evgeniy Baglaev games? This Samdan Samdanov vs Evgeniy Baglaev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samdan Samdanov vs Evgeniy Baglaev?
Samdan Samdanov vs Evgeniy Baglaev (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Samdan Samdanov vs Evgeniy Baglaev?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samdan Samdanov vs Evgeniy Baglaev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.