Mittal Samarth vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury
1. Lakecity Rapid 2019, 2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mittal Samarth vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mittal Samarth (1624)
- Black
- Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury (2294)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 1. Lakecity Rapid 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mittal Samarth (1624) and Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury (2294) was played at 1. Lakecity Rapid 2019 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mittal Samarth games or Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury games? This Mittal Samarth vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mittal Samarth vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury?
Mittal Samarth vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Mittal Samarth.
What opening was played in Mittal Samarth vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (ECO B28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mittal Samarth vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.