Stefan Salzmann vs Patrick Carroll
15. IECG WCH-F-00005, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stefan Salzmann vs Patrick Carroll with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stefan Salzmann (2265)
- Black
- Patrick Carroll (2252)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 15. IECG WCH-F-00005
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stefan Salzmann (2265) and Patrick Carroll (2252) was played at 15. IECG WCH-F-00005 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (D48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stefan Salzmann games or Patrick Carroll games? This Stefan Salzmann vs Patrick Carroll encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stefan Salzmann vs Patrick Carroll?
Stefan Salzmann vs Patrick Carroll (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Patrick Carroll.
What opening was played in Stefan Salzmann vs Patrick Carroll?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO D48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stefan Salzmann vs Patrick Carroll, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.