Jean-Louis Salvaing vs Gildas Relaix
3. Open, 2008 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jean-Louis Salvaing vs Gildas Relaix with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jean-Louis Salvaing (2073)
- Black
- Gildas Relaix (1820)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 3. Open
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jean-Louis Salvaing (2073) and Gildas Relaix (1820) was played at 3. Open in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jean-Louis Salvaing games or Gildas Relaix games? This Jean-Louis Salvaing vs Gildas Relaix encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jean-Louis Salvaing vs Gildas Relaix?
Jean-Louis Salvaing vs Gildas Relaix (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Jean-Louis Salvaing.
What opening was played in Jean-Louis Salvaing vs Gildas Relaix?
The game opened with the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (ECO C12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jean-Louis Salvaing vs Gildas Relaix, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.