Aleksandras Salna vs Dangis Bagdanskis
2014 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (D51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandras Salna vs Dangis Bagdanskis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandras Salna (1679)
- Black
- Dangis Bagdanskis (1510)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (D51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandras Salna (1679) and Dangis Bagdanskis (1510) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (D51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandras Salna games or Dangis Bagdanskis games? This Aleksandras Salna vs Dangis Bagdanskis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandras Salna vs Dangis Bagdanskis?
Aleksandras Salna vs Dangis Bagdanskis (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksandras Salna.
What opening was played in Aleksandras Salna vs Dangis Bagdanskis?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation, Knight Defense (ECO D51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandras Salna vs Dangis Bagdanskis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.