Ivan Salgado Lopez vs Vladislav Artemiev
European Blitz 2018, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan Salgado Lopez vs Vladislav Artemiev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan Salgado Lopez (2629)
- Black
- Vladislav Artemiev (2709)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- European Blitz 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan Salgado Lopez (2629) and Vladislav Artemiev (2709) was played at European Blitz 2018 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan Salgado Lopez games or Vladislav Artemiev games? This Ivan Salgado Lopez vs Vladislav Artemiev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan Salgado Lopez vs Vladislav Artemiev?
Ivan Salgado Lopez vs Vladislav Artemiev (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Vladislav Artemiev.
What opening was played in Ivan Salgado Lopez vs Vladislav Artemiev?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan Salgado Lopez vs Vladislav Artemiev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.