Julio Salgado Gonzalez vs Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros
2011 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julio Salgado Gonzalez vs Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julio Salgado Gonzalez (1825)
- Black
- Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros (1931)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julio Salgado Gonzalez (1825) and Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros (1931) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julio Salgado Gonzalez games or Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros games? This Julio Salgado Gonzalez vs Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julio Salgado Gonzalez vs Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros?
Julio Salgado Gonzalez vs Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Julio Salgado Gonzalez.
What opening was played in Julio Salgado Gonzalez vs Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (ECO A83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julio Salgado Gonzalez vs Jose Luis Rubio Trigueros, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.