Paolo Salati vs Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky
ICCF-FM/2886, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paolo Salati vs Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paolo Salati (1738)
- Black
- Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky (2489)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ICCF-FM/2886
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paolo Salati (1738) and Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky (2489) was played at ICCF-FM/2886 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paolo Salati games or Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky games? This Paolo Salati vs Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paolo Salati vs Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky?
Paolo Salati vs Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky.
What opening was played in Paolo Salati vs Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paolo Salati vs Ivan Anatolevich Panitevsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.