Arthur Salata vs Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst
Brazil Telecom Sesc Open, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arthur Salata vs Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arthur Salata (1395)
- Black
- Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst (1892)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Brazil Telecom Sesc Open
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arthur Salata (1395) and Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst (1892) was played at Brazil Telecom Sesc Open in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arthur Salata games or Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst games? This Arthur Salata vs Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arthur Salata vs Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst?
Arthur Salata vs Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst.
What opening was played in Arthur Salata vs Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (ECO E60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arthur Salata vs Matheus Frederico Stapenhorst, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.