Vaidas Sakalauskas vs Aleksei Garanin
Baltic Zonal Liepaja 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vaidas Sakalauskas vs Aleksei Garanin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vaidas Sakalauskas (2344)
- Black
- Aleksei Garanin (2220)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Baltic Zonal Liepaja 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vaidas Sakalauskas (2344) and Aleksei Garanin (2220) was played at Baltic Zonal Liepaja 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vaidas Sakalauskas games or Aleksei Garanin games? This Vaidas Sakalauskas vs Aleksei Garanin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vaidas Sakalauskas vs Aleksei Garanin?
Vaidas Sakalauskas vs Aleksei Garanin (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Aleksei Garanin.
What opening was played in Vaidas Sakalauskas vs Aleksei Garanin?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vaidas Sakalauskas vs Aleksei Garanin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.