Utkal Ranjan Sahoo vs Irakli Beradze
World Junior Open 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Utkal Ranjan Sahoo vs Irakli Beradze with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Utkal Ranjan Sahoo (2266)
- Black
- Irakli Beradze (2440)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- World Junior Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Utkal Ranjan Sahoo (2266) and Irakli Beradze (2440) was played at World Junior Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Utkal Ranjan Sahoo games or Irakli Beradze games? This Utkal Ranjan Sahoo vs Irakli Beradze encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Utkal Ranjan Sahoo vs Irakli Beradze?
Utkal Ranjan Sahoo vs Irakli Beradze (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Irakli Beradze.
What opening was played in Utkal Ranjan Sahoo vs Irakli Beradze?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Utkal Ranjan Sahoo vs Irakli Beradze, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.