Eltaj Safarli vs Tamas Jr. Fodor
London Classic Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eltaj Safarli vs Tamas Jr. Fodor with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eltaj Safarli (2691)
- Black
- Tamas Jr. Fodor (2494)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- London Classic Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eltaj Safarli (2691) and Tamas Jr. Fodor (2494) was played at London Classic Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eltaj Safarli games or Tamas Jr. Fodor games? This Eltaj Safarli vs Tamas Jr. Fodor encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eltaj Safarli vs Tamas Jr. Fodor?
Eltaj Safarli vs Tamas Jr. Fodor (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Eltaj Safarli.
What opening was played in Eltaj Safarli vs Tamas Jr. Fodor?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (ECO C05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eltaj Safarli vs Tamas Jr. Fodor, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.