Patrick Saering vs Fabrizio Barbanera
Badenweiler GER, Open 2009, 2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patrick Saering vs Fabrizio Barbanera with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patrick Saering (2134)
- Black
- Fabrizio Barbanera (2147)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Badenweiler GER, Open 2009
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patrick Saering (2134) and Fabrizio Barbanera (2147) was played at Badenweiler GER, Open 2009 in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patrick Saering games or Fabrizio Barbanera games? This Patrick Saering vs Fabrizio Barbanera encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patrick Saering vs Fabrizio Barbanera?
Patrick Saering vs Fabrizio Barbanera (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Patrick Saering vs Fabrizio Barbanera?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patrick Saering vs Fabrizio Barbanera, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.