Daniel Sadzikowski vs Michal Paterek
London Classic Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Sadzikowski vs Michal Paterek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Sadzikowski (2547)
- Black
- Michal Paterek (2311)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- London Classic Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Sadzikowski (2547) and Michal Paterek (2311) was played at London Classic Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Sadzikowski games or Michal Paterek games? This Daniel Sadzikowski vs Michal Paterek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Sadzikowski vs Michal Paterek?
Daniel Sadzikowski vs Michal Paterek (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Daniel Sadzikowski.
What opening was played in Daniel Sadzikowski vs Michal Paterek?
The game opened with the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (ECO A11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Sadzikowski vs Michal Paterek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.