Krzysztof Sacharewicz vs Ryszard Ceglowski
2012 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Krzysztof Sacharewicz vs Ryszard Ceglowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Krzysztof Sacharewicz (1504)
- Black
- Ryszard Ceglowski (1870)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Krzysztof Sacharewicz (1504) and Ryszard Ceglowski (1870) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Krzysztof Sacharewicz games or Ryszard Ceglowski games? This Krzysztof Sacharewicz vs Ryszard Ceglowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Krzysztof Sacharewicz vs Ryszard Ceglowski?
Krzysztof Sacharewicz vs Ryszard Ceglowski (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Ryszard Ceglowski.
What opening was played in Krzysztof Sacharewicz vs Ryszard Ceglowski?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Krzysztof Sacharewicz vs Ryszard Ceglowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.