Fabio Saccone vs Alessandro Della Corte
2011 · Result ½–½ · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fabio Saccone vs Alessandro Della Corte with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fabio Saccone (2308)
- Black
- Alessandro Della Corte (2253)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fabio Saccone (2308) and Alessandro Della Corte (2253) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fabio Saccone games or Alessandro Della Corte games? This Fabio Saccone vs Alessandro Della Corte encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fabio Saccone vs Alessandro Della Corte?
Fabio Saccone vs Alessandro Della Corte (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fabio Saccone vs Alessandro Della Corte?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fabio Saccone vs Alessandro Della Corte, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.