Afzal Hossain Sacchu vs Sohel Chowdhury
2016 · Result ½–½ · Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Afzal Hossain Sacchu vs Sohel Chowdhury with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Afzal Hossain Sacchu (2010)
- Black
- Sohel Chowdhury (2197)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Afzal Hossain Sacchu (2010) and Sohel Chowdhury (2197) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (A12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Afzal Hossain Sacchu games or Sohel Chowdhury games? This Afzal Hossain Sacchu vs Sohel Chowdhury encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Afzal Hossain Sacchu vs Sohel Chowdhury?
Afzal Hossain Sacchu vs Sohel Chowdhury (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Afzal Hossain Sacchu vs Sohel Chowdhury?
The game opened with the Réti Opening: Anglo-Slav Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO A12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Afzal Hossain Sacchu vs Sohel Chowdhury, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.