Frantisek Sabolik vs Richard Kolman
SVK-chT2B 9596, date unknown · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frantisek Sabolik vs Richard Kolman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frantisek Sabolik (2225)
- Black
- Richard Kolman (2185)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- SVK-chT2B 9596
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frantisek Sabolik (2225) and Richard Kolman (2185) was played at SVK-chT2B 9596 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frantisek Sabolik games or Richard Kolman games? This Frantisek Sabolik vs Richard Kolman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frantisek Sabolik vs Richard Kolman?
Frantisek Sabolik vs Richard Kolman finished 0–1, a win for Richard Kolman.
What opening was played in Frantisek Sabolik vs Richard Kolman?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frantisek Sabolik vs Richard Kolman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.