Giuseppe Sabbatini vs Luis Maria Vieito Soria
WSTT/7/10/2, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Smyslov Defense (C93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Giuseppe Sabbatini vs Luis Maria Vieito Soria with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Giuseppe Sabbatini (1973)
- Black
- Luis Maria Vieito Soria (1942)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WSTT/7/10/2
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Smyslov Defense (C93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Giuseppe Sabbatini (1973) and Luis Maria Vieito Soria (1942) was played at WSTT/7/10/2 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Smyslov Defense (C93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Giuseppe Sabbatini games or Luis Maria Vieito Soria games? This Giuseppe Sabbatini vs Luis Maria Vieito Soria encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Smyslov Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Giuseppe Sabbatini vs Luis Maria Vieito Soria?
Giuseppe Sabbatini vs Luis Maria Vieito Soria (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Giuseppe Sabbatini vs Luis Maria Vieito Soria?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Smyslov Defense (ECO C93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Giuseppe Sabbatini vs Luis Maria Vieito Soria, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.