Maciej Rutkowski vs Ireneusz Lada
Karpacz POL, Karkonosze Open 2010, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maciej Rutkowski vs Ireneusz Lada with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maciej Rutkowski (2405)
- Black
- Ireneusz Lada (2146)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Karpacz POL, Karkonosze Open 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maciej Rutkowski (2405) and Ireneusz Lada (2146) was played at Karpacz POL, Karkonosze Open 2010 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maciej Rutkowski games or Ireneusz Lada games? This Maciej Rutkowski vs Ireneusz Lada encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maciej Rutkowski vs Ireneusz Lada?
Maciej Rutkowski vs Ireneusz Lada (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Maciej Rutkowski.
What opening was played in Maciej Rutkowski vs Ireneusz Lada?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (ECO E15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maciej Rutkowski vs Ireneusz Lada, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.