Gediminas Rutkauskas vs Dainius Linauskas
LTU Ch, 2000 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gediminas Rutkauskas vs Dainius Linauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gediminas Rutkauskas (2081)
- Black
- Dainius Linauskas (2323)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- LTU Ch
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gediminas Rutkauskas (2081) and Dainius Linauskas (2323) was played at LTU Ch in 2000 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (E15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gediminas Rutkauskas games or Dainius Linauskas games? This Gediminas Rutkauskas vs Dainius Linauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gediminas Rutkauskas vs Dainius Linauskas?
Gediminas Rutkauskas vs Dainius Linauskas (2000) finished 0–1, a win for Dainius Linauskas.
What opening was played in Gediminas Rutkauskas vs Dainius Linauskas?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation (ECO E15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gediminas Rutkauskas vs Dainius Linauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.