Juan Jose Russo vs Leonardo Tristan
39. Open, 2008 · Result 0–1 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Jose Russo vs Leonardo Tristan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Jose Russo (1816)
- Black
- Leonardo Tristan (2345)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 39. Open
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Jose Russo (1816) and Leonardo Tristan (2345) was played at 39. Open in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Jose Russo games or Leonardo Tristan games? This Juan Jose Russo vs Leonardo Tristan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Jose Russo vs Leonardo Tristan?
Juan Jose Russo vs Leonardo Tristan (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Leonardo Tristan.
What opening was played in Juan Jose Russo vs Leonardo Tristan?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (ECO A89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Jose Russo vs Leonardo Tristan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.