Miguel Angel Ruperez vs Diego Valerga
2016 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Angel Ruperez vs Diego Valerga with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Angel Ruperez (2203)
- Black
- Diego Valerga (2477)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Angel Ruperez (2203) and Diego Valerga (2477) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Angel Ruperez games or Diego Valerga games? This Miguel Angel Ruperez vs Diego Valerga encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Angel Ruperez vs Diego Valerga?
Miguel Angel Ruperez vs Diego Valerga (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Diego Valerga.
What opening was played in Miguel Angel Ruperez vs Diego Valerga?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO E39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Angel Ruperez vs Diego Valerga, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.