Romas Ruksenas vs Darius Babrauskas
2018 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Romas Ruksenas vs Darius Babrauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Romas Ruksenas (1933)
- Black
- Darius Babrauskas (2030)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Romas Ruksenas (1933) and Darius Babrauskas (2030) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Romas Ruksenas games or Darius Babrauskas games? This Romas Ruksenas vs Darius Babrauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Romas Ruksenas vs Darius Babrauskas?
Romas Ruksenas vs Darius Babrauskas (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Darius Babrauskas.
What opening was played in Romas Ruksenas vs Darius Babrauskas?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Romas Ruksenas vs Darius Babrauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.