Roberto Ruiz Sanchez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez
2013 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Ruiz Sanchez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Ruiz Sanchez (1953)
- Black
- Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez (1762)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Ruiz Sanchez (1953) and Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez (1762) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Ruiz Sanchez games or Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez games? This Roberto Ruiz Sanchez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Ruiz Sanchez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez?
Roberto Ruiz Sanchez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Roberto Ruiz Sanchez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Ruiz Sanchez vs Eduardo Alvarez Gonzalez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.