Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo vs Antonio Roy Laguens
ESP/W/M/063 (ESP), 2013 · Result 0–1 · Semi-Slav Defense (D43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo vs Antonio Roy Laguens with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo (1609)
- Black
- Antonio Roy Laguens (1937)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ESP/W/M/063 (ESP)
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense (D43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo (1609) and Antonio Roy Laguens (1937) was played at ESP/W/M/063 (ESP) in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense (D43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo games or Antonio Roy Laguens games? This Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo vs Antonio Roy Laguens encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo vs Antonio Roy Laguens?
Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo vs Antonio Roy Laguens (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Antonio Roy Laguens.
What opening was played in Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo vs Antonio Roy Laguens?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense (ECO D43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo vs Antonio Roy Laguens, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.