Jan Rueggeberg vs Holger Ziegenfuss
2012 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jan Rueggeberg vs Holger Ziegenfuss with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jan Rueggeberg (1880)
- Black
- Holger Ziegenfuss (1978)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jan Rueggeberg (1880) and Holger Ziegenfuss (1978) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jan Rueggeberg games or Holger Ziegenfuss games? This Jan Rueggeberg vs Holger Ziegenfuss encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jan Rueggeberg vs Holger Ziegenfuss?
Jan Rueggeberg vs Holger Ziegenfuss (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Holger Ziegenfuss.
What opening was played in Jan Rueggeberg vs Holger Ziegenfuss?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (ECO A27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jan Rueggeberg vs Holger Ziegenfuss, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.