Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia vs Antonio Sanchez Camacho
Galapagar ESP, Open 2005, 2005 · Result 0–1 · Benko Gambit (A57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia vs Antonio Sanchez Camacho with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia (2004)
- Black
- Antonio Sanchez Camacho (2161)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Galapagar ESP, Open 2005
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Benko Gambit (A57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia (2004) and Antonio Sanchez Camacho (2161) was played at Galapagar ESP, Open 2005 in 2005 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benko Gambit (A57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia games or Antonio Sanchez Camacho games? This Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia vs Antonio Sanchez Camacho encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia vs Antonio Sanchez Camacho?
Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia vs Antonio Sanchez Camacho (2005) finished 0–1, a win for Antonio Sanchez Camacho.
What opening was played in Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia vs Antonio Sanchez Camacho?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit (ECO A57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Ignacio Rubio Mejia vs Antonio Sanchez Camacho, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.