Pablo Ruano vs Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez
FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_C__000140, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (B56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pablo Ruano vs Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pablo Ruano (1660)
- Black
- Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez (1735)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_C__000140
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (B56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pablo Ruano (1660) and Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez (1735) was played at FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_C__000140 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (B56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pablo Ruano games or Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez games? This Pablo Ruano vs Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pablo Ruano vs Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez?
Pablo Ruano vs Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez.
What opening was played in Pablo Ruano vs Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pablo Ruano vs Jesus Antonio Padilla Alvarez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.