Joseph Rozewicz vs Avraham Rave
World Senior 65+ 2014, 2014 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joseph Rozewicz vs Avraham Rave with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joseph Rozewicz (1576)
- Black
- Avraham Rave (1847)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- World Senior 65+ 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joseph Rozewicz (1576) and Avraham Rave (1847) was played at World Senior 65+ 2014 in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joseph Rozewicz games or Avraham Rave games? This Joseph Rozewicz vs Avraham Rave encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joseph Rozewicz vs Avraham Rave?
Joseph Rozewicz vs Avraham Rave (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Avraham Rave.
What opening was played in Joseph Rozewicz vs Avraham Rave?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joseph Rozewicz vs Avraham Rave, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.