Robert Rózanski vs Petr Vachtfeidl
BCCA/2018/CanC (ENG), 2018 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C72).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Rózanski vs Petr Vachtfeidl with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Rózanski (2270)
- Black
- Petr Vachtfeidl (1870)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BCCA/2018/CanC (ENG)
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C72)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Rózanski (2270) and Petr Vachtfeidl (1870) was played at BCCA/2018/CanC (ENG) in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C72). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Rózanski games or Petr Vachtfeidl games? This Robert Rózanski vs Petr Vachtfeidl encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Rózanski vs Petr Vachtfeidl?
Robert Rózanski vs Petr Vachtfeidl (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Robert Rózanski.
What opening was played in Robert Rózanski vs Petr Vachtfeidl?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (ECO C72).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Rózanski vs Petr Vachtfeidl, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.