Antonio Roy Laguens vs Carlos Almarza Mato
ESP/W/M/061 (ESP), 2013 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (D96).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Roy Laguens vs Carlos Almarza Mato with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Roy Laguens (1937)
- Black
- Carlos Almarza Mato (2148)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ESP/W/M/061 (ESP)
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (D96)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Roy Laguens (1937) and Carlos Almarza Mato (2148) was played at ESP/W/M/061 (ESP) in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (D96). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Roy Laguens games or Carlos Almarza Mato games? This Antonio Roy Laguens vs Carlos Almarza Mato encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Roy Laguens vs Carlos Almarza Mato?
Antonio Roy Laguens vs Carlos Almarza Mato (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Antonio Roy Laguens.
What opening was played in Antonio Roy Laguens vs Carlos Almarza Mato?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Russian Variation (ECO D96).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Roy Laguens vs Carlos Almarza Mato, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.