Thomas Roussel-Roozmon vs Mathieu Cloutier
Quebec Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Classical Variation (A70).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Roussel-Roozmon vs Mathieu Cloutier with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Roussel-Roozmon (2454)
- Black
- Mathieu Cloutier (1993)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Quebec Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Classical Variation (A70)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Roussel-Roozmon (2454) and Mathieu Cloutier (1993) was played at Quebec Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Classical Variation (A70). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Roussel-Roozmon games or Mathieu Cloutier games? This Thomas Roussel-Roozmon vs Mathieu Cloutier encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Roussel-Roozmon vs Mathieu Cloutier?
Thomas Roussel-Roozmon vs Mathieu Cloutier (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Thomas Roussel-Roozmon.
What opening was played in Thomas Roussel-Roozmon vs Mathieu Cloutier?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Classical Variation (ECO A70).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Roussel-Roozmon vs Mathieu Cloutier, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.