Juergen Rothkegel vs Hans Tuente
2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juergen Rothkegel vs Hans Tuente with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juergen Rothkegel (1979)
- Black
- Hans Tuente (1594)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juergen Rothkegel (1979) and Hans Tuente (1594) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juergen Rothkegel games or Hans Tuente games? This Juergen Rothkegel vs Hans Tuente encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juergen Rothkegel vs Hans Tuente?
Juergen Rothkegel vs Hans Tuente (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Juergen Rothkegel.
What opening was played in Juergen Rothkegel vs Hans Tuente?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (ECO B75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juergen Rothkegel vs Hans Tuente, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.