Peter Roth Jr. vs Jean-Pierre Camps
EU/SC-OR 219, 2017 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Roth Jr. vs Jean-Pierre Camps with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Roth Jr. (1786)
- Black
- Jean-Pierre Camps (1969)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- EU/SC-OR 219
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Roth Jr. (1786) and Jean-Pierre Camps (1969) was played at EU/SC-OR 219 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Roth Jr. games or Jean-Pierre Camps games? This Peter Roth Jr. vs Jean-Pierre Camps encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Roth Jr. vs Jean-Pierre Camps?
Peter Roth Jr. vs Jean-Pierre Camps (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Peter Roth Jr..
What opening was played in Peter Roth Jr. vs Jean-Pierre Camps?
The game opened with the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (ECO C12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Roth Jr. vs Jean-Pierre Camps, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.