Philip J Rossiter vs Phillip G Coghini
2015 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Philip J Rossiter vs Phillip G Coghini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Philip J Rossiter (2376)
- Black
- Phillip G Coghini (1747)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Philip J Rossiter (2376) and Phillip G Coghini (1747) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Philip J Rossiter games or Phillip G Coghini games? This Philip J Rossiter vs Phillip G Coghini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Philip J Rossiter vs Phillip G Coghini?
Philip J Rossiter vs Phillip G Coghini (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Philip J Rossiter.
What opening was played in Philip J Rossiter vs Phillip G Coghini?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Philip J Rossiter vs Phillip G Coghini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.