Giampiero Rossi vs Alberto Laricini
2012 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Giampiero Rossi vs Alberto Laricini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Giampiero Rossi (1896)
- Black
- Alberto Laricini (1801)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Giampiero Rossi (1896) and Alberto Laricini (1801) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Giampiero Rossi games or Alberto Laricini games? This Giampiero Rossi vs Alberto Laricini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Giampiero Rossi vs Alberto Laricini?
Giampiero Rossi vs Alberto Laricini (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Giampiero Rossi vs Alberto Laricini?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Giampiero Rossi vs Alberto Laricini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.