Davi Mantovani Rossi vs Neil Farrell
31. World Senior 50+, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Davi Mantovani Rossi vs Neil Farrell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Davi Mantovani Rossi (1795)
- Black
- Neil Farrell (2096)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 31. World Senior 50+
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Davi Mantovani Rossi (1795) and Neil Farrell (2096) was played at 31. World Senior 50+ in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Davi Mantovani Rossi games or Neil Farrell games? This Davi Mantovani Rossi vs Neil Farrell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Davi Mantovani Rossi vs Neil Farrell?
Davi Mantovani Rossi vs Neil Farrell (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Davi Mantovani Rossi.
What opening was played in Davi Mantovani Rossi vs Neil Farrell?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (ECO E05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Davi Mantovani Rossi vs Neil Farrell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.